Kohout v. Newman
This text of 109 N.W. 1133 (Kohout v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was here on a former appeal. 96 Minn. 61, 104 N. W. 764. It was then held that the evidence whs sufficient to take the case to the jury on the question of defendant’s negligence, and the cause was remanded for a new trial. The evidence presented on this appeal is in all substantial respects the same as on the former appeal, and we follow and apply the decision then made, holding that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The damages are not so excessive as to justify interference by this court
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 N.W. 1133, 99 Minn. 519, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohout-v-newman-minn-1906.