Kohout v. Newman

109 N.W. 1133, 99 Minn. 519, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 483
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 26, 1906
DocketNos. 14,884—(30)
StatusPublished

This text of 109 N.W. 1133 (Kohout v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kohout v. Newman, 109 N.W. 1133, 99 Minn. 519, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 483 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was here on a former appeal. 96 Minn. 61, 104 N. W. 764. It was then held that the evidence whs sufficient to take the case to the jury on the question of defendant’s negligence, and the cause was remanded for a new trial. The evidence presented on this appeal is in all substantial respects the same as on the former appeal, and we follow and apply the decision then made, holding that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The damages are not so excessive as to justify interference by this court

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kohout v. Newman
104 N.W. 764 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 N.W. 1133, 99 Minn. 519, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohout-v-newman-minn-1906.