Kohne v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
This text of 192 A.2d 761 (Kohne v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The applicant, Alvin Abby Kohne, in his petition for relief under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act, alleged that (a) he was convicted on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice and on his past record of criminal offenses, (b) his court-appointed counsel was utterly inadequate, (c) he was denied the right to appeal by his counsel and by the trial court (he said he wrote a letter to the trial judge, which was never answered, asking for a new trial or, in the alternative, an ap[634]*634peal), and (d) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction.
At a hearing where he was represented by court-appointed counsel and at which he appeared and testified, Kohne pressed only two of the contentions made in his petition — conviction on the basis of his past record and inadequacy of counsel — and Judge Dorsey, before whom the matter came, after hearing testimony and argument of counsel, made findings of fact against him in both instances.
Application denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A.2d 761, 232 Md. 633, 1963 Md. LEXIS 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohne-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1963.