Kohnberg v. Murdock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kohnberg v. Murdock

6 A.D.2d 876, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 A.D.2d 876 (Kohnberg v. Murdock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohnberg v. Murdock, 6 A.D.2d 876, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York which granted ah application under subdivision (e) of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit the erection and operation of a gasoline service station and accessory uses, in a local retail district, for a period of 15 years, subject to conditions and safeguards imposed by the board. The appeal is from an order granting motions to vacate the order of certiorari, dismiss the petition and confirm the determination of the board. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent board, payable by the appellants. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ. [10 Misc 2d 567.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding to review a determination of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York which granted ah application under subdivision (e) of section 7 of the Zoning Resolution of the City of New York for a variance to permit the erection and operation of a gasoline service station and accessory uses, in a local retail district, for a period of 15 years, subject to conditions and safeguards imposed by the board. The appeal is from an order granting motions to vacate the order of certiorari, dismiss the petition and confirm the determination of the board. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent board, payable by the appellants. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ. [10 Misc 2d 567.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 876, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohnberg-v-murdock-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack