Kohn v. New Way Auto Painting Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kohn v. New Way Auto Painting Corp.

251 A.D. 850, 296 N.Y.S. 675, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7947

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1937·Published

Opinion

Action for personal injuries caused by plaintiff’s being struck by the contents of a pail of burning naphtha thrown upon him by an employee of the defendant while he was a business visitor of the defendant. Judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence disclosed that the alleged emergency arose as a consequence of defendant’s own negligence. Under such circumstances, exculpation is not available to the defendant under the claim that the act complained of was due to an error of judgment during an emergency. (Van Ingen v. Jewish Hospital, 182 App. Div. 10, 14.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for personal injuries caused by plaintiff’s being struck by the contents of a pail of burning naphtha thrown upon him by an employee of the defendant while he was a business visitor of the defendant. Judgment for the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence disclosed that the alleged emergency arose as a consequence of defendant’s own negligence. Under such circumstances, exculpation is not available to the defendant under the claim that the act complained of was due to an error of judgment during an emergency. (Van Ingen v. Jewish Hospital, 182 App. Div. 10, 14.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Kohn v. New Way Auto Painting Corp., 251 A.D. 850, 296 N.Y.S. 675, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

251 A.D. 850 (Kohn v. New Way Auto Painting Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related