Kohn v. Harris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kohn v. Harris

174 A.D. 855

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Ho sufficient or satisfactory excuse has been offered for the delay in prosecution. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Ho sufficient or satisfactory excuse has been offered for the delay in prosecution. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order so far as appealed from reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Kohn v. Harris, 174 A.D. 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

174 A.D. 855 (Kohn v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.