Kohn v. Fandel
13 N.W. 904, 29 Minn. 470, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 151
Opinion
The evidence of the defendant clearly and unmistakably shows that the services sued for were rendered under a contract to work for three months, and that, before the end of such term, plaintiff quit work without any excuse. This evidence is not contradicted by plaintiff, and there is no reason suggested by the record for disregarding it. Upon it the judgment ought to have been for defendant.
Order reversed, and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kohn v. Fandel, 13 N.W. 904, 29 Minn. 470, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 151 (Mich. 1882).
13 N.W. 904 (Kohn v. Fandel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Fehsefeldt
118 N.W. 797 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)
Sipley v. Stickney
76 N.E. 226 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Peterson v. Mayer
13 L.R.A. 72 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1891)