Kohn v. Fandel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Kohn v. Fandel

13 N.W. 904, 29 Minn. 470, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 151

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 31, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 13 N.W. 904 (Kohn v. Fandel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohn v. Fandel, 13 N.W. 904, 29 Minn. 470, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 151 (Mich. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The evidence of the defendant clearly and unmistakably shows that the services sued for were rendered under a contract to work for three months, and that, before the end of such term, plaintiff quit work without any excuse. This evidence is not contradicted by plaintiff, and there is no reason suggested by the record for disregarding it. Upon it the judgment ought to have been for defendant.

Order reversed, and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The evidence of the defendant clearly and unmistakably shows that the services sued for were rendered under a contract to work for three months, and that, before the end of such term, plaintiff quit work without any excuse. This evidence is not contradicted by plaintiff, and there is no reason suggested by the record for disregarding it. Upon it the judgment ought to have been for defendant.

Order reversed, and new trial ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.W. 904, 29 Minn. 470, 1882 Minn. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohn-v-fandel-minn-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack