Kohm v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company
81 N.E. 1168, 188 N.Y. 598, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1256
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ; Dissenting : Edward T. Bartlett, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kohm v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company, 81 N.E. 1168, 188 N.Y. 598, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1256 (N.Y. 1907).
81 N.E. 1168 (Kohm v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.