Kohler v. Powell

Ohio Supreme Court

Kohler v. Powell

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 835

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1926

DocketNo. 19960; No. 19961

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 835 (Kohler v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohler v. Powell, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 835 (Ohio 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

KINKADE, J.

1. Section 3162 of the General Code confers upon the common pleas court full, complete and exclusive authority to promulgate rules trol by the sheriff of the county jail and the and regulations for the management and con-persons confined therein, including the feeding of the prisoners.

2. The sheriff has no right to collect from the county to reimburse himself for expenditures made or indebtedness incurred for feeding the prisoners confined in the county jail any sum in excess of such disbursement or indebtedness so incurred. The law does not permit the sheriff to secure a private personal profit out of the feeding of the prisoners confined in the jail.

Motion overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, CJ., 'Matthias, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KINKADE, J.

1. Section 3162 of the General Code confers upon the common pleas court full, complete and exclusive authority to promulgate rules trol by the sheriff of the county jail and the and regulations for the management and con-persons confined therein, including the feeding of the prisoners.

2. The sheriff has no right to collect from the county to reimburse himself for expenditures made or indebtedness incurred for feeding the prisoners confined in the county jail any sum in excess of such disbursement or indebtedness so incurred. The law does not permit the sheriff to secure a private personal profit out of the feeding of the prisoners confined in the jail.

Motion overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, CJ., 'Matthias, Day, Allen and Robinson, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Ohio Law. Abs. 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohler-v-powell-ohio-1926.