Kohler v. Grzesk

133 N.E. 506, 77 Ind. App. 702, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 57
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 3, 1922
DocketNo. 10,979
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 133 N.E. 506 (Kohler v. Grzesk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kohler v. Grzesk, 133 N.E. 506, 77 Ind. App. 702, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 57 (Ind. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Nichols, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for damages for the conversion of an automobile.

[703]*703The only question which appellant attempts to present is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. Conceding, without deciding, that appellant’s brief shows that the evidence is in the record, a question not presented by appellee, we have carefully examined the purported evidence contained in appellant’s original brief and reply brief, as supplemented by appellee in his brief, and we hold that the same abundantly supports the finding and judgment of the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntington Grocery Co. v. Vanbuskirk, Rec.
150 N.E. 927 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1926)
Huntington Grocery Co. v. VanBuskirk
84 Ind. App. 708 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.E. 506, 77 Ind. App. 702, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohler-v-grzesk-indctapp-1922.