Kohler v. Cordes

City of New York Municipal Court

Kohler v. Cordes

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901

DecidedJuly 1, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901 (Kohler v. Cordes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohler v. Cordes, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Newburger, J.

This in an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. This action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. This answer admits the sales at the prices stated, but alleges an extension of the time for the payment by reason of the acceptance by the plaintiff of defendant’s three promissory notes for the amount of the purchase price, which had not matured at the time of the commencement of the action.' The [902]*902plaintiff, however, claimed that the defendant had been guilty of fraud in obtaining the merchandise and the extension of the credit, and therefore was authorized to rescind the credit, and sue for goods sold. The trial justice properly submitted the question of fraud to the jury, and a careful examination of the appeal book fails to disclose any error on trial. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Newburger, J.

This in an appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. This action was brought to recover for goods sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendant. This answer admits the sales at the prices stated, but alleges an extension of the time for the payment by reason of the acceptance by the plaintiff of defendant’s three promissory notes for the amount of the purchase price, which had not matured at the time of the commencement of the action.' The [902]*902plaintiff, however, claimed that the defendant had been guilty of fraud in obtaining the merchandise and the extension of the credit, and therefore was authorized to rescind the credit, and sue for goods sold. The trial justice properly submitted the question of fraud to the jury, and a careful examination of the appeal book fails to disclose any error on trial. Judgment must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.Y. St. Rep. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohler-v-cordes-nynyccityct-1893.