Kohler Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

345 F.2d 748
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1965
DocketNo. 18961
StatusPublished

This text of 345 F.2d 748 (Kohler Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kohler Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 345 F.2d 748 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a former appeal1 we enforced in large part a previous Board order, but remanded the case to the Board for further consideration of two questions: whether the strike was an unfair labor practice strike from its inception, and whether any of the 77 strikers denied reinstatement by the Board should be reinstated in light of the principles enunciated in National Labor Relations Board v. Thayer Co., 218 F.2d 748 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 883, 75 S.Ct. 123, 99 L.Ed. 694 (1954). On remand the Board determined that the strike was an unfair labor practice from its inception, and that 57 of the 74 surviving strikers who had been denied reinstatement should be reinstated. The Kohler Company petitions for review.

The Board properly applied the principles announced in our initial decision, and its determinations are supported by substantial evidence on the record viewed as a whole, Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). The petition for review will be denied, and the Board’s supplementary order enforced in full.

So ordered.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 F.2d 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohler-co-v-national-labor-relations-board-cadc-1965.