Kohler & Chase v. United American Lines, Inc.

S.D. New York

Kohler & Chase v. United American Lines, Inc.

60 F.2d 530, 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1346

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1932

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 F.2d 530 (Kohler & Chase v. United American Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohler & Chase v. United American Lines, Inc., 60 F.2d 530, 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1346 (S.D.N.Y. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK J. COLEMAN, District Judge.

In admiralty. Exceptions by libelants and respondents to report of special commissioner appointed by Judge Woolsey to hear and report upon all the issues raised by the pleadings. Without reciting each of the forty-four exceptions filed, by the libelants, it must suffice to state that I have examined them and have not only found tho special commissioner’s rulings correct, but that he has adequately staled the basis for them.

As to the exceptions of the respondents, while it is regrettable that further litigation may be necessary in order to determine the rights of all the parties, I believe that the special commissioner was technically correct in his rulings as to the insufficiency of the tender and the unavailability of the offset. These exceptions also are, therefore, overruled. '

Settle decree in accordance with the report of the special commissioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK J. COLEMAN, District Judge.

In admiralty. Exceptions by libelants and respondents to report of special commissioner appointed by Judge Woolsey to hear and report upon all the issues raised by the pleadings. Without reciting each of the forty-four exceptions filed, by the libelants, it must suffice to state that I have examined them and have not only found tho special commissioner’s rulings correct, but that he has adequately staled the basis for them.

As to the exceptions of the respondents, while it is regrettable that further litigation may be necessary in order to determine the rights of all the parties, I believe that the special commissioner was technically correct in his rulings as to the insufficiency of the tender and the unavailability of the offset. These exceptions also are, therefore, overruled. '

Settle decree in accordance with the report of the special commissioner.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.2d 530, 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohler-chase-v-united-american-lines-inc-nysd-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack