Kohl v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
This text of 32 Misc. 765 (Kohl v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The testimony of plaintiff, if not contradicted by defendant, would have entitled and justified the jury in rendering a verdict against defendant. It was error, therefore, to dismiss the complaint.
Judgment reversed, a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Conlan, J., concurs.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Misc. 765, 66 N.Y.S. 482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohl-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nynyccityct-1900.