Kohl v. AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY

933 N.E.2d 208, 15 N.Y.3d 763, 906 N.Y.S.2d 809
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 2010
StatusPublished

This text of 933 N.E.2d 208 (Kohl v. AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kohl v. AMERICAN TRANSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, 933 N.E.2d 208, 15 N.Y.3d 763, 906 N.Y.S.2d 809 (N.Y. 2010).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

*764 Kristopher Kohl, a passenger in a taxicab, was sued by a bicyclist who claimed that he was injured when Kohl opened the taxi’s door. The Appellate Division correctly held that Kohl was not insured under the taxi owner’s policy of automobile liability insurance. The policy says that it “shall inure to the benefit of any person legally operating” the insured vehicle in the business of the insured. The word “operating” cannot be stretched to include a passenger’s riding in the car or opening the door.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. McRae
933 N.E.2d 207 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
933 N.E.2d 208, 15 N.Y.3d 763, 906 N.Y.S.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohl-v-american-transit-insurance-company-ny-2010.