Kohilakis v. Harwood

15 A.D.2d 795, 224 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11595

This text of 15 A.D.2d 795 (Kohilakis v. Harwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kohilakis v. Harwood, 15 A.D.2d 795, 224 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11595 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

In our opinion, upon the record presented, no real issue survives for trial. It was solely within the competence of the Town Board to determine the comprehensiveness and the propriety of the contracts let for the incinerator plant, provided only that the actual final aggregate amount of such contracts does not exceed the limits fixed by the Town Board resolution and the public referendum authorizing the improvement. The undisputed facts here show that the actual final aggregate amount of the contracts let and to be let will be within such limits. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Hill, Babin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.2d 795, 224 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohilakis-v-harwood-nyappdiv-1962.