Kohilakis v. Harwood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kohilakis v. Harwood

10 A.D.2d 950, 201 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10354

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 950 (Kohilakis v. Harwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kohilakis v. Harwood, 10 A.D.2d 950, 201 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for declaratory judgment and incidental injunctive relief, seeking the annulment and restraint of certain actions of the defendants directed toward the establishment in a residential area of a new garbage incinerator plant for the municipality, in pursuance of a referendum approving the same, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 9, 1959, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and (2) from a judgment entered thereon September 11, 1950, dismissing the complaint. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to the rights of the appellants to pursue, if so advised, such other cause of action at law or in equity as they may hereafter possess when the proposed incinerator is constructed and in operation. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for declaratory judgment and incidental injunctive relief, seeking the annulment and restraint of certain actions of the defendants directed toward the establishment in a residential area of a new garbage incinerator plant for the municipality, in pursuance of a referendum approving the same, the plaintiffs appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered September 9, 1959, granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and (2) from a judgment entered thereon September 11, 1950, dismissing the complaint. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to the rights of the appellants to pursue, if so advised, such other cause of action at law or in equity as they may hereafter possess when the proposed incinerator is constructed and in operation. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 950, 201 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kohilakis-v-harwood-nyappdiv-1960.