Koger v. Woody

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1238

DEBORAH KOGER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

C. T. WOODY, in his official capacity as Sheriff, City of Richmond, Virginia,

Defendant – Appellee,

ROBERT A. DYBING,

Movant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:09-cv-00090-MHL)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deborah Koger, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Ward, MORRIS & MORRIS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Deborah Koger appeals the magistrate judge’s * order

granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her retaliation

claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003

& Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s

order. See Koger v. Woody, No. 3:09-cv-00090-MHL (E.D. Va.

Jan. 26, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to the exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction by a magistrate judge, as permitted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).