Koffler v. Standard Brief Case Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koffler v. Standard Brief Case Co.

11 A.D.2d 781, 205 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8706

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 781 (Koffler v. Standard Brief Case Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koffler v. Standard Brief Case Co., 11 A.D.2d 781, 205 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a salesman formerly in defendant’s employ to recover a balance of commissions alleged to be due him on the basis of sales of goods in a certain territory, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 25, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion for a discovery and inspection of certain books and records of defendant, on condition that defendant serve an affidavit - upon the plaintiff listing the total amount of sales made by defendant to each of its customers within such territory in each of the calendar years 1953 to 1956, inclusive, and in the period [782]*782from June 1, 1952 to December 31, 1952. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Storer v. Bion Exhibits, 283 App. Div. 829; Gemson v. Perreault, 201 App. Div. 649; Wilson v. Van Dorn Iron Works Co., 106 Mise. 442, affd. 188 App. Div. 928.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a salesman formerly in defendant’s employ to recover a balance of commissions alleged to be due him on the basis of sales of goods in a certain territory, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated February 25, 1960, denying plaintiff’s motion for a discovery and inspection of certain books and records of defendant, on condition that defendant serve an affidavit - upon the plaintiff listing the total amount of sales made by defendant to each of its customers within such territory in each of the calendar years 1953 to 1956, inclusive, and in the period [782]*782from June 1, 1952 to December 31, 1952. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. (Storer v. Bion Exhibits, 283 App. Div. 829; Gemson v. Perreault, 201 App. Div. 649; Wilson v. Van Dorn Iron Works Co., 106 Mise. 442, affd. 188 App. Div. 928.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 781, 205 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koffler-v-standard-brief-case-co-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack