Koettegen v. Mayor of Paterson
101 A. 253, 90 N.J.L. 698, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 407
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
[700]*700For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, White, IIeppeni-ibimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Koettegen v. Mayor of Paterson, 101 A. 253, 90 N.J.L. 698, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 407 (N.J. 1917).
101 A. 253 (Koettegen v. Mayor of Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirsch Holding Co. v. Borough of Manasquan
93 A.2d 582 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)