Koester v. Wagner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koester v. Wagner

186 A.D.2d 522

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 186 A.D.2d 522 (Koester v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koester v. Wagner, 186 A.D.2d 522 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), entered on October 28, 1992, is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. As the parties conceded on oral argument, the critical issue herein is whether the certificate of substitution was timely filed in accordance with the Election Law. Clearly, the ten-day provision of section 6-158 of the Election Law applies, to be measured from the last day to file a declination. That requirement was met. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred W. Eggert, J.), entered on October 28, 1992, is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. As the parties conceded on oral argument, the critical issue herein is whether the certificate of substitution was timely filed in accordance with the Election Law. Clearly, the ten-day provision of section 6-158 of the Election Law applies, to be measured from the last day to file a declination. That requirement was met. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koester-v-wagner-nyappdiv-1992.