Koester v. Koester

254 A.D. 756, 4 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7487
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 756 (Koester v. Koester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koester v. Koester, 254 A.D. 756, 4 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7487 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

In an action for separation, order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out certain paragraphs of the amended answer, and for other relief, modified by striking from the ordering paragraph the words “ in all respects ” and by adding thereto, after the word “ denied,” the words “ except as to paragraph numbered I, as to which the motion to strike out is granted.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Defendant may serve a further amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon if so advised. Paragraph I of the amended answer does not make clear which allegations of the complaint are admitted and which are denied. The plaintiff and the court are entitled to an answer drawn in such form that it conveniently shows what the issues are. (Stroock Plush Co. v. Talcott, 129 App. Div. 14; International Railway Co. v. Jaggard, 204 id. 67.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of New York v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
34 Misc. 2d 56 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 756, 4 N.Y.S.2d 207, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koester-v-koester-nyappdiv-1938.