Koerner v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koerner v. Board of Education

61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10221

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 796 (Koerner v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koerner v. Board of Education, 61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant In a CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel appellant to comply with the provisions of article 7 of the Public Officers Law, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered April 7, 1977, which granted the petition to the extent of directing the appellant to comply with, and observe the requirements of, article 7. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The weekly planning sessions of the appellant are patently meetings within the meaning of the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law, art 7) (Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh, 60 AD2d 409). We note that certain subjects raised at the appellant’s planning sessions fall within the areas covered by section 100 of the Public Officers Law. As to such subjects, the appellant may conduct executive sessions in accordance with that statute (see Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh, n 1, p 413, supra). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant In a CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel appellant to comply with the provisions of article 7 of the Public Officers Law, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered April 7, 1977, which granted the petition to the extent of directing the appellant to comply with, and observe the requirements of, article 7. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The weekly planning sessions of the appellant are patently meetings within the meaning of the Open Meetings Law (Public Officers Law, art 7) (Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh, 60 AD2d 409). We note that certain subjects raised at the appellant’s planning sessions fall within the areas covered by section 100 of the Public Officers Law. As to such subjects, the appellant may conduct executive sessions in accordance with that statute (see Matter of Orange County Pub. v Council of City of Newburgh, n 1, p 413, supra). Latham, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 796, 401 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koerner-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack