Koerber v. Rutherford

262 A.D. 869, 28 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6322
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1941·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Action for accounting in connection with a joint venture. Order dated May 17, 1941, directing the examination of defendants before trial and the production of books and papers, modified on the law by striking therefrom items numbered 6, 7, 9 and 10 of the directing paragraph of the order for the examination of the defendants, and those items of the ordering paragraph directing the production of books and papers designated as items (b), (c), (d) and (e). As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, the examinations to proceed on ten days’ notice. The right to an accounting must be established before examination as to the items eliminated may be had. The appeal from the order denying defendants’ motion for reargument was dismissed by decision dated May 28, 1941. (Koerber v. Rutherford, ante, p. 781.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koerber v. Rutherford, 262 A.D. 869, 28 N.Y.S.2d 581, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

262 A.D. 869 (Koerber v. Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schreier v. Mascola
81 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Wishman v. Genesee-Monroe Racing Ass'n
43 A.D.2d 785 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Corwin v. Kaufman
37 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
Gaetz v. Crawford
273 A.D. 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)