Koeppel v. City of New York

202 A.D.2d 181, 610 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1755
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Koeppel v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 A.D.2d 477

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered January 12, 1993, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

There are triable issues of fact whether defendant is the same corporate entity that owned and constructed the building abutting the special use sidewalk where plaintiff was allegedly injured, based upon both factual similarities between the two entities and the judicial admission in defendant’s answer. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koeppel v. City of New York, 202 A.D.2d 181, 610 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 181 (Koeppel v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.