Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

628 A.2d 985, 226 Conn. 913, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 235
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 21, 1993
DocketSC 14795
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 628 A.2d 985 (Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 628 A.2d 985, 226 Conn. 913, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 235 (Colo. 1993).

Opinion

The defendant Susan Oygard’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 395 (AC 8672), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that an appellant’s failure to file a zoning appeal within the thirty day time limit provided in General Statutes § 8-7 deprives a zoning board of appeals of subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal?

“2. If the answer to question (1) is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, Oygard’s appeal was untimely?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals
645 A.2d 983 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Miniter v. Zoning Board of Appeals
642 A.2d 67 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)
Bloom v. Zon. Bd. of Appeals, Norwalk, No. Cv 93-0303192 (Feb. 25, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1892 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 A.2d 985, 226 Conn. 913, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koepke-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-conn-1993.