Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals

599 A.2d 382, 220 Conn. 931, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 509
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 13, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant Susan Oygard’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 25 Conn. App. 611, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly hold that the contents of the public hearing notice published by the board was so inadequate as to deprive it of jurisdiction?

“2. Should the Appellate Court, after concluding that the Coventry board of appeals lacked jurisdiction of the plaintiff’s appeal from the granting of a permit by the zoning enforcement officer because the hearing notice [932]*932was defective, have ordered that the board conduct a new hearing on the plaintiffs appeal after giving proper notice thereof?”

Mark K. Branse, in support of the petition. Duncan J. Forsyth, in opposition. Decided November 13, 1991

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 599 A.2d 382, 220 Conn. 931, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 509 (Colo. 1991).

599 A.2d 382 (Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Koepke v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Coventry
610 A.2d 1301 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)