Koepke v. First Nat. Bank of De Kalb

284 N.E.2d 671, 5 Ill. App. 3d 799, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2807
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 21, 1972
Docket71-224
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 284 N.E.2d 671 (Koepke v. First Nat. Bank of De Kalb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koepke v. First Nat. Bank of De Kalb, 284 N.E.2d 671, 5 Ill. App. 3d 799, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2807 (Ill. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Mr. JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the trial court dismissing his complaint.

World Construction Company, Inc. was incorporated in 1964 and dissolved, by court decree, in 1966. In 1970, the plaintiff, the majority shareholder of the defunct corporation, on behalf of all shareholders brought an action in equity based upon breach of contract. Financial injury was the only equity alleged.

The trial judge granted defendant’s motion to dismiss on the basis of Section 157.94 of the Business Corporation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 32, sec. 157.94) which provides:

“The dissolution of a corporation * * * shall not take away or impair any remedy available to or against such corporation, its directors, or shareholders, for any right or claim existing, or any liability incurred, prior to such dissolution if action or other proceeding thereon is commenced within two years after the date of such dissolution 8 8 8"

The plaintiff concedes that the corporation must bring an action within two years of dissolution, but attempts to avoid the statute by alleging that his action is an equitable one brought, not by the corporation, but by the shareholders.

The provisions of the statute are clearly applicable, 1) to the defunct corporation, to its directors and shareholders (see, Gordon v. Loew’s Incorporated (D.C.N.J. 1956), 147 F.Supp. 398), and 2) to “any remedy,” which would include an action brought in equity.

Judgment affirmed.

ABRAHAMSON and GUILD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGinley Partners, LLC v. Royalty Properties, LLC
2018 IL App (1st) 171317 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2019)
Adams v. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
2016 IL App (3d) 150418 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2016)
Weis v. Wark
36 F. Supp. 2d 805 (N.D. Illinois, 1999)
Davis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
727 F. Supp. 549 (D. South Dakota, 1989)
Grunloh v. Effingham Equity, Inc.
528 N.E.2d 1031 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1988)
Shute v. Chambers
492 N.E.2d 528 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1986)
Riley v. Fitzgerald
178 Cal. App. 3d 871 (California Court of Appeal, 1986)
Carmichael v. Halstead Nursing Center, Ltd.
701 P.2d 934 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1985)
Van Pelt v. Greathouse
364 N.W.2d 14 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Canadian Ace Brewing Co. v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co.
629 F.2d 1183 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Poliquin v. Sapp
390 N.E.2d 974 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1979)
Canadian Ace Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
448 F. Supp. 769 (N.D. Illinois, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 N.E.2d 671, 5 Ill. App. 3d 799, 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koepke-v-first-nat-bank-of-de-kalb-illappct-1972.