Koenigsmark v. State
This text of 434 N.E.2d 260 (Koenigsmark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (80 AD2d 707).
*930 Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg concurs in the following memorandum: Since the very recent decision in Topel v Long Is. Jewish Med. Center (55 NY2d 682, 685 [Fuchsberg, J., dissenting]) would have required that this case be dismissed, not just on the facts as the Court of Claims and the Appellate Division did, but on the law as well, a fortiori, I too vote to affirm though on constraint of that case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 N.E.2d 260, 55 N.Y.2d 928, 449 N.Y.S.2d 191, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koenigsmark-v-state-ny-1982.