Koenigsberger v. Mial

101 A. 184, 90 N.J.L. 695, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 406

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1917·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in'the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kaltscti, White, Heppeniieiaiisr, Williams. Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koenigsberger v. Mial, 101 A. 184, 90 N.J.L. 695, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 406 (N.J. 1917).

Pincite

101 A. 184 (Koenigsberger v. Mial) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.