Koenigsberger v. Mial

101 A. 184, 90 N.J.L. 695, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 406
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 A. 184 (Koenigsberger v. Mial) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koenigsberger v. Mial, 101 A. 184, 90 N.J.L. 695, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 406 (N.J. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review will he affirmed, for the reasons set forth in'the opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Kaltscti, White, Heppeniieiaiisr, Williams. Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 11.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co. v. McGlory
20 F.2d 545 (Fifth Circuit, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A. 184, 90 N.J.L. 695, 1917 N.J. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koenigsberger-v-mial-nj-1917.