Koenigsberger v. Kahn
This text of 228 A.D. 658 (Koenigsberger v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— ■ Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss amended complaint granted, with ten doEars costs, upon authority of Boag v. Thompson (208 App. Div. 132). Lazansky, P. J., Rich and Young, JJ., concur; Seeger and Seudder, JJ., dissent upon the ground that equity wiE disregard the forms of a corporation where the interests of justice require and the facts warrant such action. (Thomashefsky v. Edelstein, 192 App. Div. 368.) That seems to be the situation in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 A.D. 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koenigsberger-v-kahn-nyappdiv-1929.