Koenig v. Whitehead

208 So. 2d 832
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 1968
DocketNo. 67-366
StatusPublished

This text of 208 So. 2d 832 (Koenig v. Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koenig v. Whitehead, 208 So. 2d 832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant is appealing from an order denying a petition for letters testamentary. The appellant contends that the county judge erred by refusing to find a certain provision of a joint will ambiguous, by refusing to allow certain testimony into, evidence, and by refusing to admit to probate the above-mentioned will.

The judge in his order very ably set forth the contentions of the parties, the pertinent facts, and the reasons for his holdings. The appellant has failed to point out to this court any error on the part of the county judge. Therefore, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 So. 2d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koenig-v-whitehead-fladistctapp-1968.