Koenig v. Simpson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Koenig v. Simpson

239 S.W.3d 657, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2007 WL 4234456

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 4, 2007

DocketED 89612

StatusPublished

This text of 239 S.W.3d 657 (Koenig v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koenig v. Simpson, 239 S.W.3d 657, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2007 WL 4234456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Koenig (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Joseph Simpson (Defendant) in Plaintiffs wrongful death action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude, upon de novo review, that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Defendant. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Koenig (Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Joseph Simpson (Defendant) in Plaintiffs wrongful death action.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude, upon de novo review, that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to Defendant. ITT Commercial Fin. Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 S.W.3d 657, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1639, 2007 WL 4234456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koenig-v-simpson-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack