Koenig v. Delotte Haskins & Sells
This text of 474 So. 2d 305 (Koenig v. Delotte Haskins & Sells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We hold that a settlement with one plaintiff is record activity calculated to hasten a cause to resolution, and therefore it was [306]*306error for the trial court to dismiss the cause as to a remaining plaintiff because of alleged nonactivity pursuant to Rule 1.420, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See and Compare Eastern Elevator, Inc., v. Page, 263 So.2d 218 (Fla.1972); Nektaredes v. Sagonias, 432 So.2d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Marschall v. Water-Boggan International, Inc., 401 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); DeVaney v. Rumsch, 247 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).
The order under review dismissing the cause is reversed for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
474 So. 2d 305, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1737, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koenig-v-delotte-haskins-sells-fladistctapp-1985.