Koenig v. Delotte Haskins & Sells

474 So. 2d 305, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1737, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15448
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 1985·No. No. 84-2499·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that a settlement with one plaintiff is record activity calculated to hasten a cause to resolution, and therefore it was [306] error for the trial court to dismiss the cause as to a remaining plaintiff because of alleged nonactivity pursuant to Rule 1.420, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See and Compare Eastern Elevator, Inc., v. Page, 263 So.2d 218 (Fla.1972); Nektaredes v. Sagonias, 432 So.2d 769 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Marschall v. Water-Boggan International, Inc., 401 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); DeVaney v. Rumsch, 247 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971).

The order under review dismissing the cause is reversed for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koenig v. Delotte Haskins & Sells, 474 So. 2d 305, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1737, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15448 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

474 So. 2d 305 (Koenig v. Delotte Haskins & Sells) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Valdes v. Perez
645 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission v. Emerald Corp.
823 P.2d 944 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1991)