Koellhoffer v. Hillebrand
This text of 144 A.D. 915 (Koellhoffer v. Hillebrand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, as to the appellant Hillebrand, and reversed as to the appellants Schneider and Farragut Realty Company, and new. trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish a cause of action against either [916]*916of them in plaintiff’s favor. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 A.D. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koellhoffer-v-hillebrand-nyappdiv-1911.