Koeller v. Director of Revenue
This text of 782 S.W.2d 652 (Koeller v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner filed an ex parte application for limited driving privileges pursuant to § 302.309.3, RSMo 1986.1 The circuit court approved the application; Director appeals.
The disposition of this case is governed by Manner v. Director of Revenue, 762 S.W.2d 881 (Mo.App.1989). “Because Director was not a party in the court below, he has no right to appeal the court’s order, and we are without jurisdiction.” Id. at 882.
In Manner, we quoted the following language from Robinson v. Director of Revenue, 762 S.W.2d 872, 874 (Mo.App.1989): “[I]t would seem that Director should also be a party to actions in which the driver is seeking hardship driving privileges. It is axiomatic that there should be some representation by the State in a proceeding related to the granting of a hardship license to ensure statutory compliance.” We then noted, “However, § 302.309.3 provides for an ex parte proceeding, and does not provide for notice to the director. We are constrained under this section to dismiss the appeal, and we note that if the procedures governing hardship driving privileges are to be changed, it is a matter to be determined by the legislature.”2
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
782 S.W.2d 652, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1519, 1989 WL 125673, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koeller-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-1989.