Koehler v. Trachtenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koehler v. Trachtenberg

127 A.D.2d 822, 512 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43315

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 1987·Published

Opinion

In an action to foreclose on a mortgage, the defendant Trachtenberg appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated June 24, 1985, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against it, after a nonjury trial.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence submitted at trial was sufficient to establish a prima facie case. The plaintiff proved that he was the mortgagee and that the mortgage was unpaid (see, Isaacson v Karpe, 84 AD2d 868; Redmond v Hughes, 151 App Div 99). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to foreclose on a mortgage, the defendant Trachtenberg appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rosenblatt, J.), dated June 24, 1985, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against it, after a nonjury trial.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence submitted at trial was sufficient to establish a prima facie case. The plaintiff proved that he was the mortgagee and that the mortgage was unpaid (see, Isaacson v Karpe, 84 AD2d 868; Redmond v Hughes, 151 App Div 99). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Koehler v. Trachtenberg, 127 A.D.2d 822, 512 N.Y.S.2d 343, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

127 A.D.2d 822 (Koehler v. Trachtenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related