Koehler v. State

151 N.E. 923, 198 Ind. 728, 1926 Ind. LEXIS 192
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1926·No. No. 24,998.·Published

Opinion

Travis, J.

The only error presented, which is supported by the record and appellant’s brief, is the ruling of the trial court overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only legal reason presented by this motion is the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of guilty by the court. The narration of the evidence in appellant’s brief sustains every material element of the offense charged against appellant, which is therefore sufficient to sustain the finding of guilty by the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koehler v. State, 151 N.E. 923, 198 Ind. 728, 1926 Ind. LEXIS 192 (Ind. 1926).

151 N.E. 923 (Koehler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.