Koehler v. Saltzman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Koehler v. Saltzman

4 A.2d 509, 125 N.J. Eq. 97, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 635

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 6, 1939·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined and considered with care the pleadings and evidence as exhibited by the state of the case, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and conclude that the order from which the appeal is taken was fully justified, and such order will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have examined and considered with care the pleadings and evidence as exhibited by the state of the case, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and conclude that the order from which the appeal is taken was fully justified, and such order will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Koehler v. Saltzman, 4 A.2d 509, 125 N.J. Eq. 97, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 635 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

4 A.2d 509 (Koehler v. Saltzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.