Koehler v. Saltzman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Koehler v. Saltzman

4 A.2d 509, 125 N.J. Eq. 97, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 635

DecidedFebruary 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.2d 509 (Koehler v. Saltzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koehler v. Saltzman, 4 A.2d 509, 125 N.J. Eq. 97, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 635 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have examined and considered with care the pleadings and evidence as exhibited by the state of the case, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and conclude that the order from which the appeal is taken was fully justified, and such order will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have examined and considered with care the pleadings and evidence as exhibited by the state of the case, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and conclude that the order from which the appeal is taken was fully justified, and such order will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.2d 509, 125 N.J. Eq. 97, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koehler-v-saltzman-nj-1939.