Koehler v. Marcona Mining Co.

518 F.2d 696
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJuly 8, 1975
DocketNos. 73-3441, 74-1042
StatusPublished

This text of 518 F.2d 696 (Koehler v. Marcona Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koehler v. Marcona Mining Co., 518 F.2d 696 (9th Cir. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and SNEED, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

These appeals involve the construction of contracts dealing with the mining of iron ore on the Marcona Plateau, Province of Nazea, Department of lea, Republic of Peru. The district court’s development of the relevant and material facts in its opinion, Koehler v. Marcona Mining Co. and Cobian v. Marcona Mining Co., 391 F.Supp. 1158 (N.D.Cal.1973), is exceptionally comprehensive and its findings are thoroughly supported by the massive record, consisting, among other things, of fourteen volumes of testimony.

We hold that the district court accurately applied the relevant law to the facts. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments on the basis of the lower court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Koehler v. Marcona Mining Co.
391 F. Supp. 1158 (N.D. California, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
518 F.2d 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koehler-v-marcona-mining-co-ca9-1975.