Koehler v. Department of Agriculture & Markets

164 Misc. 44, 299 N.Y.S. 131, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1816
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 8, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

McNaught, J.

For the reasons outlined in Pavlick v. Department of Agriculture & Markets (164 Misc. 42), decided concurrently herewith, the motion of the plaintiff for an injunction pendente lite is denied, without costs.

The motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint is granted without costs, upon the ground that the complaint now fails to state cause of action, as it seeks to enjoin the enforcement and to secure a declaratory judgment of unconstitutionality as to a statute that by legislation has ceased to exist.

Submit orders accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koehler v. Department of Agriculture & Markets, 164 Misc. 44, 299 N.Y.S. 131, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1816 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1937).

164 Misc. 44 (Koehler v. Department of Agriculture & Markets) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & Markets
17 N.E.2d 407 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)