Koehler v. Campbell

36 N.Y.S. 1110
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 21, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 N.Y.S. 1110 (Koehler v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koehler v. Campbell, 36 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Opinion

LAWRENCE, J.

In this case, I am of the opinion that the defendant and his attorney were guilty of deceit in interposing a false answer; that the service of such answer impeded, if it did not defeat, the rights of the plain[1111]*1111tiffs; and that such service was a contempt of court, and is punishable accordingly. A fine in the sum of $832.91, the amount of the^ judgment, and the costs of this proceeding, which are fixed at the sum of $50, is therefore imposed upon each of the parties. Martin Cantine Co. v. Warshauer, 7 Misc. Rep. 412, 28 N. Y. Supp. 139.

Settle order on one day’s notice, in circuit (part 1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fromme v. Gray
36 N.Y.S. 1107 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 N.Y.S. 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koehler-v-campbell-nysupct-1894.