Koehler v. Campbell

36 N.Y.S. 1110
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 21, 1894·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LAWRENCE, J.

In this case, I am of the opinion that the defendant and his attorney were guilty of deceit in interposing a false answer; that the service of such answer impeded, if it did not defeat, the rights of the plain[1111] tiffs; and that such service was a contempt of court, and is punishable accordingly. A fine in the sum of $832.91, the amount of the^ judgment, and the costs of this proceeding, which are fixed at the sum of $50, is therefore imposed upon each of the parties. Martin Cantine Co. v. Warshauer, 7 Misc. Rep. 412, 28 N. Y. Supp. 139.

Settle order on one day’s notice, in circuit (part 1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koehler v. Campbell, 36 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

36 N.Y.S. 1110 (Koehler v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fromme v. Gray
36 N.Y.S. 1107 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1895)