Koehler v. Adler
91 N.Y. 657
Opinion
All concur, except Rapadlo, J., absent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Koehler v. Adler, 91 N.Y. 657 (N.Y. 1883).
91 N.Y. 657 (Koehler v. Adler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kings County Trust Co. v. Hyams
152 N.E. 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Van Alstyne
147 A.D. 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Cunningham's Administrator v. Speagle
50 S.W. 244 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1899)
Kroh v. Heins
67 N.W. 771 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Van Vechten v. Van Vechten
20 N.Y.S. 140 (New York Supreme Court, 1892)
Gage v. Phillips
24 P. 60 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1891)
Clift v. . Moses
20 N.E. 392 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Richmond v. Brewster
2 N.Y.S. 400 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1888)
Cary v. Western Union Telephone Co.
20 Abb. N. Cas. 333 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)
Wheeler v. Kuntz
9 N.Y. St. Rep. 496 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1887)
Saratoga County Bank v. Leach
44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 336 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)
Stuart v. Patterson
44 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 113 (New York Supreme Court, 1885)