Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley
This text of 362 So. 2d 1043 (Koehler Electrical Supply Co. v. Berkley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are called upon here to determine whether a mechanic’s lien was timely foreclosed. Appellant recorded a claim of lien on August 16,1976, and filed a complaint to foreclose the lien on August 16, 1977. The trial court dismissed the action with prejudice for failure to enforce the lien within one year. We reverse.
The applicable mechanic’s lien statute provides:
“No lien provided by part I shall continue for a longer period than 1 year after the claim of lien has been recorded, unless within that time an action to enforce the lien is commenced.” Fla.Stat. Sec. 713.22(1).
The Rules of Court uniformly prescribe that in computing time, the day of the event from which the period of time begins to run shall not be included. Rule 1.090(a) Fla.R. Civ.P., Rule 3.040 Fla.R.Crim.P., Rule 9.420(e) Fla.R.App.P. In construing Fla. Stat. Sec. 95.031 which provides for computation of time under statutes of limitation, the court in Morrey v. Eytchison & Hoppes, Inc., 338 So.2d 558 (Fla.2d DCA 1976) simi[1044]*1044larly held. Appellant’s complaint was, therefore, filed within one year and should not have been dismissed.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 So. 2d 1043, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koehler-electrical-supply-co-v-berkley-fladistctapp-1978.