Koegel v. Birnbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Koegel v. Birnbaum

27 A.D.2d 653, 278 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4975

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1967

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.2d 653 (Koegel v. Birnbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koegel v. Birnbaum, 27 A.D.2d 653, 278 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered on September 14, 1966, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, made pursuant to CPLR 3213, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted, with $10 costs. This is an action on a note given by defendants in payment for plaintiff’s stock in Douglas Restaurant Corp. Plaintiff fully complied with all the terms and conditions contained in the agreement of sale of his interests in Douglas Restaurant Corp., when he deposited his stock in said corporation, duly indorsed in blank, with the escrowee and executed a general release. No other facts constituting a defense are alleged. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered on September 14, 1966, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, made pursuant to CPLR 3213, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted, with $10 costs. This is an action on a note given by defendants in payment for plaintiff’s stock in Douglas Restaurant Corp. Plaintiff fully complied with all the terms and conditions contained in the agreement of sale of his interests in Douglas Restaurant Corp., when he deposited his stock in said corporation, duly indorsed in blank, with the escrowee and executed a general release. No other facts constituting a defense are alleged. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.2d 653, 278 N.Y.S.2d 177, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koegel-v-birnbaum-nyappdiv-1967.