Koeffler v. Koeffler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Koeffler v. Koeffler

164 N.W. 1011, 166 Wis. 193, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 209

DecidedOctober 23, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 164 N.W. 1011 (Koeffler v. Koeffler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Koeffler v. Koeffler, 164 N.W. 1011, 166 Wis. 193, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 209 (Wis. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Esghweiler, J.

The only question raised on this appeal is whether or not there is sufficient testimony in the record to support the conclusion of the trial court that the time has now arrived at which that certain trust created in favor of the plaintiff, Hugo Koeffler, by the last will and testament of Charles Koeffler, deceased, who was the father of plaintiff, Hugo Koeffler, and the defendants, Charles A. Koeffler, Jr., Louis Luebben, and Hermine Baumgarten, could be properly terminated, the trustee relieved, and the trust funds and estate turned over to said plaintiff.

It is deemed unnecessary to recite the terms of the trust created and concerned here or the testimony; it suffices to say that we are satisfied that under the evidence in this case the court below was warranted in deciding that the plaintiff is now entitled to have turned over to him said trust funds, the trust estate conveyed and assigned to him, and that the defendant Charles A. Koeffler, Jr., as trustee may thereupon be released and discharged.

By the Court. — Judgment of the circuit court affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Esghweiler, J.

The only question raised on this appeal is whether or not there is sufficient testimony in the record to support the conclusion of the trial court that the time has now arrived at which that certain trust created in favor of the plaintiff, Hugo Koeffler, by the last will and testament of Charles Koeffler, deceased, who was the father of plaintiff, Hugo Koeffler, and the defendants, Charles A. Koeffler, Jr., Louis Luebben, and Hermine Baumgarten, could be properly terminated, the trustee relieved, and the trust funds and estate turned over to said plaintiff.

It is deemed unnecessary to recite the terms of the trust created and concerned here or the testimony; it suffices to say that we are satisfied that under the evidence in this case the court below was warranted in deciding that the plaintiff is now entitled to have turned over to him said trust funds, the trust estate conveyed and assigned to him, and that the defendant Charles A. Koeffler, Jr., as trustee may thereupon be released and discharged.

By the Court. — Judgment of the circuit court affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.W. 1011, 166 Wis. 193, 1917 Wisc. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koeffler-v-koeffler-wis-1917.