Kody Lee Broxton v. State

Opinion

ACCEPTED

03-15-00042-CR

4786219

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

4/7/2015 11:23:24 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

NO. 03-15-00042-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/8/2015 2:39:24 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

Clerk

****************

KODY LEE BROXTON VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS **************** ON APPEAL FROM THE 27th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 73,311 **************** BRIEF FOR THE STATE ****************

HENRY GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P.O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 (254) 933-5215 / Fax (254) 933-5704 DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Authorities ................................................................................................................. ii

Appellant’s Brief ......................................................................................................................... 1

Prayer ............................................................................................................................................ 2

Certificate of Compliance with Rule 9 ............................................................................... 2

Certificate of Service ............................................................................................................... 3

i

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) ................................................................................................... 1

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969) ....................................................................................................... 1

ii

APPELLANT'S BRIEF

After a review of the record, the Appellant's counsel concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and that there are no arguable points of error (Appellant’s

Brief, pp. 1, 7).

Wherefore, Premises Considered, the State of Texas prays that the

decision of the Trial Court be affirmed, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969).

2

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, and since no reversible

error is shown, the State respectfully prays that this Court affirm the

conviction.

Respectfully submitted,

HENRY L. GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/S/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 Bar I.D. # 15200000 (254) 933-5215 / Fax (254) 933-5704 DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9

This is to certify that the State’s Brief is in compliance with Rule 9 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that portion which must be included

under Rule 9.4(i)(1) contains 369 words.

/S/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the State's Brief has

been sent to the attorney of record, Ken Mahaffey, by e-service to

Ken_Mahaffey@yahoo.com, on this the 7th day of April, 2015.

HENRY L. GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/S/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 Bar I.D. # 15200000 (254) 933-5215 / Fax (254) 933-5704 DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us