Kock v. Kock
42 Barb. 515, 1864 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 118
Opinion
said: Formerly it was usual to grant alimony and counsel tees in all actions for divorce brought by the husband against his wife, but of late the rule had been relaxed, and that it would be an outrage to grant an allowance in such a case as this.
Motion denied.
Clerke, Justice.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kock v. Kock, 42 Barb. 515, 1864 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 118 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1864).
42 Barb. 515 (Kock v. Kock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wood v. Wood
61 A.D. 96 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Brindley v. Brindley
121 Ala. 429 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Frickel v. Frickel
24 N.Y.S. 483 (Superior Court of New York, 1893)
Harding v. Harding
40 Ill. App. 202 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1891)
Rawson v. Rawson
37 Ill. App. 491 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)
Countz v. Countz
30 Ark. 73 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1875)
Miller v. Miller
43 How. Pr. 125 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
Leslie v. Leslie
6 Abb. Pr. 193 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1869)