Kocher v. Hayford

California Supreme Court

Kocher v. Hayford

59 Cal. 316

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 1881

DocketNo. 7,322

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 Cal. 316 (Kocher v. Hayford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kocher v. Hayford, 59 Cal. 316 (Cal. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court:

An examination of the record in this case satisfies us beyond doubt that the agreement of the parties to the deed sought to be reformed was that the north-east quarter of section 6 should be included, instead of the north-west quarter of that section. The findings are abundantly supported by the evidence. The decree corrects the mistake which occurred in the deed, and gives effect to the intention of the parties to it.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court:

An examination of the record in this case satisfies us beyond doubt that the agreement of the parties to the deed sought to be reformed was that the north-east quarter of section 6 should be included, instead of the north-west quarter of that section. The findings are abundantly supported by the evidence. The decree corrects the mistake which occurred in the deed, and gives effect to the intention of the parties to it.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cal. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kocher-v-hayford-cal-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack