Kocher v. Hayford
59 Cal. 316
Opinion
An examination of the record in this case satisfies us beyond doubt that the agreement of the parties to the deed sought to be reformed was that the north-east quarter of section 6 should be included, instead of the north-west quarter of that section. The findings are abundantly supported by the evidence. The decree corrects the mistake which occurred in the deed, and gives effect to the intention of the parties to it.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kocher v. Hayford, 59 Cal. 316 (Cal. 1881).
59 Cal. 316 (Kocher v. Hayford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Home & Farm Co. of Cal. v. Freitas
96 P. 808 (California Supreme Court, 1908)