Koch v. Webster Central School District Board of Education

443 N.E.2d 951, 57 N.Y.2d 1028, 457 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3859
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 11, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 443 N.E.2d 951 (Koch v. Webster Central School District Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Koch v. Webster Central School District Board of Education, 443 N.E.2d 951, 57 N.Y.2d 1028, 457 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3859 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, without costs.

*1030 Review pursuant to CPLR 7803 (subd 3), whether by Special Term or the Appellate Division, of the discretion exercised by a board of education in dismissing an employee for misconduct is limited to whether the board’s discretion was abused as a matter of law (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 234). The discretion exercised in such matters of internal discipline is of a “broader range because of ‘the complexity and sensitiveness of personnel administration in continuing intraorganizational relationships’” (Matter of Di Vito v State of New York, Dept. of Labor, 48 NY2d 761, 763, quoting Matter of Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182, 185).

In light of the findings of the hearing officer, confirmed by the appointing officer and as to which petitioner has not sought review, that petitioner persisted in his disruptive conduct despite blunt and adequate warnings and of our review of the record, we cannot say that the board abused its discretion by dismissing petitioner (cf. Matter of Gailband v Christian, 56 NY2d 890).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tinney v. Schneider
216 A.D.2d 474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Colby v. Siebert
134 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Carlan v. Board of Education
128 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Rudner v. Board of Regents of the New York State Department of Education
105 A.D.2d 555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Fitzpatrick v. Board of Education of Mamaroneck Union Free School District
96 A.D.2d 557 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
443 N.E.2d 951, 57 N.Y.2d 1028, 457 N.Y.S.2d 477, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/koch-v-webster-central-school-district-board-of-education-ny-1982.