Koch v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Koch v. State

395 S.W.3d 612, 2013 WL 1411808, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 440

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 2013·No. No. WD 74603·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randy E. Koch appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randy E. Koch appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Koch v. State, 395 S.W.3d 612, 2013 WL 1411808, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 440 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

395 S.W.3d 612 (Koch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.